The Sims Medieval
YoungOldPrude:
Quote from: professorbutters on 2011 March 25, 04:15:21
Quote from: YoungOldPrude on 2011 March 25, 02:45:23
Besides bemoaning the fact that TS3 children cannot be devoured by bears, I am currently looking at the guide (Page 54), and I cannot help but think that this sounds much more like a glitch than intentional gameplay:
"You may only have two children at a time. However, if a marriage produces more than two children, the "oldest" of the children will just sorta…disappear."
"Kids are sometimes eaten by bears. To emphasize, that's devoured—not injured. Children do not survive random bear attacks."
What are you talking about? That's not a glitch. That's a FEATURE.
I'm assuming that the kids are supposed to be apprenticed/grow up/go somewhere--not that much different from the random "moved out of the neighborhood" stuff in TS3. Since the kids don't have any genetics, it doesn't seem to matter, although I suppose you could take careful note of their appearances and recreate them as adults for later use.
Of course being devoured by bears is a feature! A Medieval feature, not a TS3 feature, which is what saddens me.
When Catherine "Brownie Bites" Brown is the one writes the guides, I distrust and suspect every bloody detail. She is too vague and cheerful for her own good. In my book, "…just sorta…disappears" is as reliable and meaningful as something you would find in the complaint posts on the official TS3 forums. I need details, dammit.
bowrain:
Is there a nocd mod out? Or what is this 4-byte edit Pescado's talking about?
J. M. Pescado:
Quote from: YoungOldPrude on 2011 March 25, 02:45:23
Besides bemoaning the fact that TS3 children cannot be devoured by bears, I am currently looking at the guide (Page 54), and I cannot help but think that this sounds much more like a glitch than intentional gameplay:
Exactly where do they actually get devoured by bears, as opposed to disappearing in a system glitch? Because it sounds to me like the original game could benefit from some bear-devourment.
Rubyelf:
I love how EA lacked to at least fix their texts in storyline parts when it comes to gender. My sim's ally, the Trade Prince, had a partner that was a male, and go figure EA reffered to him as a her. Was very annoying.
And really EA?! No allowing Children to have their appearance's changed? A child called "Urchin" is running around the town in what looks like a pretty regal dress, while the Queen's daughter looks like she's more of the kitchen hand than an actual Princess!
Pico:
Quote
To emphasize, that's devoured—not injured.
Devoured but not injured? You mean like in the Jonah & the whale story? Does the bear vomit out the child after three days and three nights and what does the child do then?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page