I've been doing a lot of reading and research on this subject, and found that AMD is being consistently rated higher than Intel cpus. I've got a 3.0 ghz P4 now, and have no idea which AMD will be about equal. And is the "dual core" or "64" similar to Intel's "hyperthreading"? I ended up disabling the hyperthreading, since it slowed everything down substantially. Must have missed something there...
Off to check out tomshardware, thanks, Stitches!
Wow, nectere, that looks like a great system you'll have!! I want to end up with something similar, incorporating a lot of the parts I already have. I went from a geforce MX400 also, but only up to a 5200 with 256, and that was also pretty amazing. I got a different one, I can't remember if it was a 6200 or 6600, but it was incompatible with the motherboard and now everything is kind of wonky even with it removed. That serves me right for not doing the proper amount of research!
Instead of using 3.0 ghz, AMD refers to it as "3000"
3.2 ghz = 3200. Snazzy, huh?
You'd have to really stress your computer out to notice a speed difference between AMD and Intel. I like AMD's customer service and longevity. As processors age and overheat, they lose much of their capability. Most research shows that AMD chips last longer.
X2 refers to being dual core. This means that you actually have TWO processors. Unfortunately, most programs currently don't take advantage of that. 64 refers to it being a 64 bit chip, rather than the standard 32. They are not the same as hyperthreading or hypertransport, which have to do with how information is transported.
If you wanted to do some good research on comparing gaming Intel and AMD pcs, I'd practice configuring them at a site like
www.alienware.com and reading the "more info" tabs. Th