More Awesome Than You!
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
2024 May 30, 19:11:22

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
540275 Posts in 18066 Topics by 6514 Members
Latest Member: Llama
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  TS3/TSM: The Pudding / Pudding Factory / Re: Coffee-Flavored Coffee (aka, Hot Beverages for Traditionalists) on: 2011 July 20, 22:28:57
 Smiley thanks, I hated the silly drinks they have in the game, I miss the normal coffee makers they used to have, I also wish they had something other then just something sweet to eat for breakfast, all they have is waffles and pancakes, then theres the other stuff cereal, toast and jam, but I would like some eggs and bacon, or eggs and sausage, or even some healthy fruit bowel would be nice, not everyone eats sweets for breakfast all the time, I mean I do like those foods sometime but not every day, hell even put in oat meal too, and a English muffin with butter, or toast and butter too, I know there were some wonderful food done by creators at Mod The Sims for the Sims 2, I wish there was some way to change the food in The Sims 3 too, the stuff they have is boring, anyway thanks again for given me something more real for my game!
2  TS3/TSM: The Pudding / Pudding Factory / Re: Pudding Factory is for downloads: put your lame requests & WCIFs here on: 2010 June 10, 03:01:23
Hi I was wondering if someone here could put all the Store stuff from the first to the latest stuff as of June 9th 2010, in Package format, decrapified. and maybe even compressed, I have tried to do this stuff myself but I just cant, I guess just too stupid, it never works when I tried it, so Please could someone do it or show where someone else has.

I noticed everyone here stopped doing it for some reason, but I cant use any of the stuff if someone else doesn't help me, I know this is a stupid thing to ask you all, but I'm sure I am not the only one who can't do it, and would like it done for them, and I know its a allot of work to do for nothing but someone thanks, but I would really be thankful to who ever does do it for me.

I thought of just going ahead and buying everything at the store then I realized it would cost at least a hundred dollars to do it, so I ether have to go with out allot of stuff, or come here and admit I'm too stupid to do it myself, and asked one of you guys to do it for me, so here I am begging for you guys help.

So Please Help!
3  TS3/TSM: The Pudding / Pudding Factory / Re: TS3Store - All Banged Up hair fixed. on: 2010 January 10, 07:52:17
 Grin Hey thanks, I noticed that too, and it pissed me off too, I swear they can't seem to get anything right anymore, guys like you keep having to fix everything for them, when there supposed to know what their doing, that's what their getting paid for, its stupid. Roll Eyes

Anyways thanks. Wink
4  TS3/TSM: The Pudding / The World Of Pudding / Re: Patch 1.8/2.3 Released - CAW Out on: 2009 December 17, 11:11:04
I think anything that was not downloaded from the store, or EA's site through the launcher is blocked with the new patch.

Yes and also sims3packs from custom content creators.

Yep. From what I can tell, launcher or no launcher, if you didn't download it from directly from the store into your game, you will no longer see it in your game.

I just wanted to say, I have allot of stuff I payed for from the store, that was downloaded from the store, that is also gone, as well as Riverview, and I can't re- Download Riverview or those store things ether, even the free stuff that I got myself is gone, and I have no CC or hacks/mods at all, Just the store stuff I got here, which is also gone of course.

I have also got a error with EA download Manager, when I go to launch the game, and when I tried to download Riverview from the the Sims 3 site.
5  TS3/TSM: The Pudding / The World Of Pudding / Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you. on: 2009 November 15, 17:27:16
Grin Hilllllarious!  Let me start off by redirecting anyone's belief that I am insulting the forum community at large.  The whole purpose of my first post was to slam the GRAMMAR POLICE.  I can see from the replies that the grammar mafia were, as expected, the most insulting and leanest on value.  I apologize for sounding so pompous to the forum community.  Had I made it clearer that all my comments were for the benefit of the grammar mafia and their own unjustifiable (-able/-ible) arrogance, the rest of you might have looked at that post from a different perspective.

It's so funny that there was no interest in this thread for almost a month until I read one post mocking someone's intelligence, got pissed off and launched on a rant.  It was unforgivable of me (-ible/-able).  I'm really too busy living a life in the real world to waste much precious time in a virtual one, though it seems virtual worlds are preferable (-able/-ible) to those of you beating up on anyone and everyone who decides to post a reply to your sacred thread.  Look at how much work you put into "amusing" avatars and badges to represent yourselves.  As I stated, I only came to this site to get a mod and thought that a thread initiated by GRAMMAR POLICE might be informative and intelligent.  I was mistaken.

I'm amazed that this thread is even allowed to exist, given the ignorance of those purporting to be its mafia squad.   You see, here is an example of IT'S and ITS being properly used.  I probably shouldn't have mentioned one of my pet peeves in the first place since you misunderstood my intent.  Your grammar mafia seem to be truly confused about which to use when.  And my FELLOWS, as you called them, would laugh me out of the room if they knew I visited this type of forum, let alone posted something.

The type of exchange I am used to directs responses to the originator and posters are encouraged to include additional information regarding the topic introduced.  Many of those posts can be quite long, being of a technical nature, and often include links to sites with even more information than is being given in the post.  I was merely utilizing habits I am familiar with when posting to forum threads.

I do appreciate the fact that anyone even made an effort to respond to my post.  I'll try address each of you in turn:

I noticed some of the mafia corrections in here pertained to the use of punctuation marks, but without any clear understanding of how they work.  Therefore, a simple lesson seemed appropriate, for the benefit of the mafia cretins, in the dynamics of how some punctuation rules came into being--from pure mechanics instead of grammatical rules.  There actually is a distinction between punctuation rules and the rules of proper grammar, just as there is a distinction for misspelling.  Just an FYI for those with so little to do that they spend all their time inaccurately making fun of everyone's inaccuracies (per word).  By the way, thanks to the individual for contributing the "full-stop" comment.  I completely forgot that what we call a "period" used to be called "full-stop."

You may want to look up redundant and unnecessary in an unabridged dictionary, though.  Sometimes the meanings of words are truncated in an abridged dictionary in an effort to save space which/that causes people to use the wrong word in the wrong context.  In the computer age, the definition of redundancy has changed from its original meaning and that is the definition that/which is most commonly found in an abridged dictionary.  Also, the term effective is subjective, not objective.  In case anyone is unfamiliar with these words, subjective (in this case) means that/which a topic is subject to a person's own biases.  To be objective is more concrete and agreed upon by the majority.  (The reason I am explaining the difference between these two words and their application is that I won't be checking back to see if anyone else misunderstands me.)  I admit that I fall into the subjective mode when viewing the effectiveness of the written communication being used by the mafia.  It falls miserably short of the mark of a real grammarian.

True, my meaning in that original post got lost in the quagmire.  I was HOT when I wrote it.  Clearly stated:

#1-That post was directed to the ORIGINATOR of this thread and others titling themselves the grammar mafia, not all posters in general.  Don't be so sensitive when you aren't even being insulted (by me, anyway).

#2-I don't care how vulgar or profane you are, in general.  It's an oxymoron, though, for people to declare themselves to be grammarians and yet be unable to express themselves in a civil and educated tone.

#3-Don't declare yourself an expert in something that you obviously don't have a broad command of, like the English language.

#4-Be more sensitive to people's mental capacities.  After all, look at how obviously limited your own capacities are.

No, I didn't believe typos would be an issue on this thread.  By admitting that I probably left behind typos shouldn't offend any of you when text-speak and acronyms are freely used here.  I meant that I'm not perfect, but I'm also not trying to pass myself off as GRAMMAR POLICE.  The length of my former post, and this one as well, should serve to inform the reader that I am able to pound out loads of crap onto a computer quickly.  Anyway, at least I put forth the effort of glancing back over my post (and deleting my more egregious insults).  To be frank, I blasted the grammar mafia pretty harshly before I edited my first post.  Can you imagine if I hadn't edited it? 

I didn't read 99% of the gibberish between page one and page 99999, so I don't understand the post about being cage-matched against someone else.  Perhaps it's another person trying to educate the great unwashed in the grammar mafia?  (The "great unwashed" is a derogatory remark from a long time ago and has dropped out of common use; it has nothing to do with hygiene.  I just like to pull it out to use on people who feel superior to others without any merit for their assumption.)

One person's which is another person's that.  Try reading, a book.  A book on grammar might be a good place to start.  You may learn something.  I have to "read up" on current grammar trends constantly for CPEs that/which are required for my job.  Oh, I'm really sorry!  My former and current intent is not to insult the forum contributors as a whole, just the mafia!

Grammar cat and grammar ferret might want to be more concerned about the "presents" coming out of their own mouths (expressed typographically, of course) instead of dropping one in someone's shoe.

We are living in the 21st century now.  The invention of the typewriter actually took care of the line-slanting problem.  The intent of that tidbit of information was a direct insult to the mafia's attempts to use punctuation rules that they clearly don't understand the origin of.  Knowing why you place which characters where can make it easier to remember what the rules are.  Stupid of me to include that before, but the generous side of me was trying to impart some wisdom on the mafia cretins.  (I just love the word cretin.)

I believe the final post that must be responded to regards how honoured an individual felt after skipping over my little foray into the world of grammar, which/that was directed at the mafia and not the posters in general.  Thank you.  I'm glad I could bring a little honour to your day.  Just kidding; I know you were being sarcastic.

I'm sorry if you responded to my post and I didn't get around to you.  As stated many times before, my post was directed at the grammar mafia and I was really hoping to hear from some of its duly initiated members.

Great job students!  At least I got a dead thread going again.  Now you kiddies will have to cross verbal blades with each other without parental guidance.  I said I would check back to see if anyone reads this thread anymore since it is nonsensical (a real word; look it up in an unabridged dictionary--just a musical way of saying nonsense).  I have done so.  Now I must say goodbye; to say farewell implies that we will be meeting each other again, and that (which?) will not happen.  I know this will reduce the few of you in the mafia who actually deigned to respond to tears, but different paths and all that . . . (ellipsis)

P.S. (Or Post-script to the nit picky)  I hope I gave the reader the option of choosing between which and that every time I used one of those words.  To the person who found my laziness in correcting my own typos funny, this next line should be a hoot.  I didn't go back over this particular installment in English 101!  Hurray!  I think my intentions have been made clear; the mafia needs a makeover and should allow conversations to flow organically.  If a post is indecipherable (-ible/-able), simply ask for clarification.  Less insulting heat may lead to more valuable exchange.

I just wanted to say I love your Avatar Shelleyb! Wink
6  TS3/TSM: The Pudding / The World Of Pudding / Re: NVidia screws ups, why updating drivers is a bad idea ... on: 2009 November 15, 15:49:01
Beta 195 drivers available now on Nvidia site if anyone needs them. TS3 problem fixed, game will work again.

Yay I was having the same problem, I had just updated to a 9600 from my 8600, and got a new driver.

My game kept crashing, to desktop, and the graphics would go wonky on the whole PC, where I would have to reboot my computer, which meant I would lose everything I had done in the game, because the game was still being shown as being on.

But I couldn't get back in to save, so I had to just reboot.

Then I also heard on the BBS that people was having trouble with their Nvidia drivers, and they had a thing about the Bata one, so I got it played my game all day yesterday, no problems, yet ( Crossing fingers).
7  TS3/TSM: The Pudding / The World Of Pudding / Re: TS3 was to include weather. on: 2009 November 15, 15:36:56
Not to play devil's advocate or anything (although that is my job title where I work in RL  Roll Eyes), I don't think EA "cut" anything from the base game. They know damn well what EPs they plan to make and they merely "set up" as much stuff in the base game as possible to prepare for it. They're in it for the money and they'll get every cent they can. If anyone ever thought they were in it for the game or the players, they need their heads checked. Get real. If they cared about the game or the players, they would be listening to all the forums on all the sites and none of the mods would even be necessary.

I totally agree, with everything you just said.

I knew they were going to leave allot out of the base game, form the start, I even told people on the BBS that they were going keep the best stuff for the STORE.

And you can bet that the Hot tub and Piano will be in the Store too.

I hated that stupid Store the first time they told us about it, but even knew they were going to do that anyways.

I think the Sims 2 store was a trial, for the Sim 3 store, to see if people would fall for it, and they did, even though most of the stuff there was in stuff packs already.

I would be fine if they put everything in stuff packs, as long as they didn't have any more the $20 bucks.

But seeing as WA is $39.99, I doubt they would have it that way.

Talk about Greedy. Angry
8  TS3/TSM: The Pudding / The World Of Pudding / Re: TS3 was to include weather. on: 2009 November 15, 15:17:51
Someone else need to make a Sims game so EA have something to battle against!

Now they can do whatever they feel like... =(

I have been thinking about that for a long time.

I even have a idea of what the game would be like.

But I am not a game maker, and know no one who is ether.

But I know it would work, it would be even better then The Sims games.

And on the subject at hand, I am not surprise that EAixis would do this.

They even lied and said there would be ducks, and swans in the ponds.

Remember the thing at the top of the site when they had the thing where you could try out making a Sim friend?

In back ground, there was the park, and you could see swans swimming in the pond!

Where are the swans now? 

Problem is, that as long as most of the people fall for their lies, and they make all the Millions they were expecting they don't care about those of us who are not happy.

Look how they reat us when we ask for help from EA Tech department, most of the time they just send you a bunch of pre-made answers, which most of the time has nothing to do with your problem.

And if you complain, they will say their sorry, but then send you the same set of answers again, and if you do it again they tell you their sorry and make you jump through a bunch hoops, doing thing they tell you to do, which never works.

Then you talk about your problem on the forum, and then one of your fellow players whines up giving you the help you needed, and you finally fix your problem.

That has happened to me many times.

Now I don't even ask EA for help, I just post on the forums and see if anyone else maybe had the problem and fixed it them self, or got help somewhere/somehow.

Its like with EA, sense you already bought the game, they really don't care if your happy with it.

Sure if Millions of players started complaining and they didn't sale as many copies of their new EP as they were hoping for, then they might start listening to us.

But that wont happen, they know they will sale all if not more then what their expecting or wanting.

Because millions of people will buy it even though its too pricey, and their already having problems with the base game.

They will buy it thinking it might fix it, or make it better,( if their not having tech problems).

Its really sad how the respect for the consumer has just went out the window.

Oh some companies still show a little, but most don't show any, and EA is right on top of the later.

Its Capitalism at its worst, oh and no one call me a Comie please, I think both is wrong, but that all is another complaint on another site,LOl.

Good to see not everyone worship every thing EA or the Sim makers do.

On the BBS they would cut your throat if you were in their presence, if you said anything against the almighty EA or Maxis/ Sims makers, or Will Wright, or so it seems.

Its nice to have a place to complain about them at, even if EA will never hear, probably! Undecided

You guys who post all the stuff from the STORE, are my Internet Hero's, like your a bunch of Robin Hoods! Grin Cool
9  TS3/TSM: The Pudding / The World Of Pudding / Re: no random sims moving into town on: 2009 November 15, 13:44:45
Once you have used "destroyallhumans" (using only AwesomeMod, which does not immigrate random Sims) you will have to manually repopulate.  The only Sims that will otherwise be generated are the ones needed to be bosses or co-workers to your Sims, and then only if you try to "meet co-workers" or "suck up to boss".  I believe IndieStone (and I think you can still use the "Mod" portion - but not the Core - with AwesomeMod) will immigrate random Sims.


Where can I find this "destroyallhumans" thing?

I had to remove Sims one family at a time, and I then only put the ones I wanted back in, but then before I knew it all these stupid  named Sims started moving in.

And I wanted to fill the town up myself, Believe me I have no problem coming up with new Sims to fill it up.

But of course the game messed that up.

Plus I would love to stop the Sim families who I am not playing from having babies all the time, it causes over population.

And I cant get the Patches because they just mess my game up.

I would just be happy if I could keep the single Sims from having babies, especially the men.

Any help would be great, thanks! 
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.089 seconds with 19 queries.