marriage and last names.
baratron:
Quote from: ZephyrZodiac on 2005 August 07, 23:28:35
I think legally there's nothing in the UK to prevent that, and never has been - often a wealthy family with only a daughter to inherit would insist on the girl's husband taking the family name so the line could be seen to continue! However, unless the husband has a really awful name (like Sidebottom or Pigg) then tradition is still on the husband's side!
In the UK it is possible for a woman to not take her husband's name on marriage - she can keep her own one, or make up a new one. The name that you sign the marriage register with becomes your legal name, so it is possible to add extra middle names or even change your first name if you want to. This is somewhat easier than doing a deed poll to change your name.
I can't remember whether the same legal standing applies to however the man signs the marriage register. I haven't paid much attention to it because I've been against legal marriage for the past n years as it's only been available to opposite-sex couples. Now that civil partnership is coming in, my objection to marriage has been removed, so I should find out about things like this :).
SimsHost:
Quote from: baratron on 2005 August 08, 14:19:35
...In the UK it is possible for a woman to not take her husband's name on marriage - she can keep her own one, or make up a new one. The name that you sign the marriage register with becomes your legal name, so it is possible to add extra middle names or even change your first name if you want to. This is somewhat easier than doing a deed poll to change your name. ...
That's the way it works in most of the 50 states in the USA. Massachusettes is an exception, where the wife is required to take the husband's name, but off hand I don't know of any other states that do this. Nevertheless, marriages where they do something other than having the wife take the husband's last name remain anecdotal anomalies, not a social norm.
Renatus:
Quote from: SimsHost on 2005 August 08, 14:30:50
Nevertheless, marriages where they do something other than having the wife take the husband's last name remain anecdotal anomalies, not a social norm.
I don't think it's so small an amount it can only be considered 'anecdotal anomalies', especially depending on region. In Finland a couple would be considered extremely old-fashioned for the wife to take the husband's name. I also know it wasn't unusual for a couple to take a different option in the Northwestern US.
Oddysey:
It's not unusual where I live for the wife to keep her name and the children take the father's name. (Or whichever one they want, once they get old enough.) Of course, divorce usually throws an entirely new wrench into the works, and may be the reason for that practice.
That was what my mom wanted to do, but she changed her mind when Dad said it was okay with him. Changed her middle name to her maiden name instead.
Hyphenated names are demon spawn! They're annoying and difficult to spell, not to mention rather unsightly, and suggest that the couple in question is actually a corporation. Or a law office.
ZephyrZodiac:
I think it's so often a case of the stronger personality wins the argument! While a lot of professional women keep their single names for work, they still tend to be known as "Mrs John Smith" for social occasions - and I personally think that is even more Victorian than just taking the same surname! But a social invitation will tend to be addressed to Mrs and Mrs John Smith (it's quicker than typing or writing Mr John Skith and Mrs Mary Smith)!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page