HACK RATING SYSTEM
gali:
I am very glad to see the groups.
But I am too lazy - I would like to see the "red-group hacks" in one group, not to search IF they belong there. Thus we shall have "group colors".
Taz:
Awesome idea! This would help me out quite a bit. Thanks Most Awesome One! ;D
J. M. Pescado:
Quote from: Kingdom on 2006 January 15, 22:58:33
Don't green and blue need to be swapped to correspond with the color spectrum, or am I just crazy?
You're not crazy, at least in this sense. That immediately struck me when I first saw it, also. Nonetheless, that's how the actual Terror Scale is.
Oddysey:
Yeah . . . it's taken Americans five years to understand the Terror Scale, and even then it's iffy. Doesn't really matter, since they're never actually going to use blue or green. This isn't quite as bad, because none of them are named "elevated."
EDIT: And it's so quintessentially Pescado to devise a rating system that makes me go "Aagh! My eyes!" every time I see it. Yeeowch. Go easy on the technicolor, wouldja?
J. M. Pescado:
I wouldn't really say one can "understand" the terror scale: There's no point to it. Vague warnings with no useful response that people can take serve no purpose except to cause more terror. If anything, the constant reminders of terrorists are more effective than anything the terrorists themselves can do, seeing as terrorists remain less deadly than swimming pools or even toilets. But there are no apparent warnings of swimming-pool-related terror.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page