Censorship again!
Trubble:
I'm with JM on this one. It'll blow over. Until the final verdict or whatever is reached, what's the point of kicking up a fuss? I see no point.
HRH Posie:
Quote from: prncstbl on 2005 July 29, 12:58:18
I'm with JM on this one. It'll blow over. Until the final verdict or whatever is reached, what's the point of kicking up a fuss? I see no point.
This is very true however if you are still interested in the issue read this thread. There are some links in there that you'll probably find useful. Personally I don't care either way. The only advantage for an M rating would be that immature children wouldn't be playing the game and posting to the BBS which *may* increase the BBS's credibility.
JenW:
Quote from: Posie Flump on 2005 July 29, 13:03:08
The only advantage for an M rating would be that immature children wouldn't be playing the game and posting to the BBS which *may* increase the BBS's credibility.
Now *there's* a good point! It won't keep the current brats off the BBS but it should help with new ones showing up. And I just went and checked the age range for teen, it's 13 and up. 13 is probably a little young to be initiating sex, I am thinking. An M rating (17 and up) is probably more appropriate anyway.
Jen
Ancient Sim:
Well, if they disable the censor blur remover (or whatever) I would have a great deal of difficulty playing the game and probably wouldn't play it very often at all. I found those squares extremely irritating and far too much 'in your face'. And as for blurring a baby's nappy - what the hell is that all about? ARE there people in this world who get off on seeing a baby's nappy? Maybe there are, but somehow I don't think they'd be buying this game to satisfy their perversions.
J. M. Pescado:
Quote from: Ancient Sim on 2005 July 29, 13:35:41
And as for blurring a baby's nappy - what the hell is that all about? ARE there people in this world who get off on seeing a baby's nappy? Maybe there are, but somehow I don't think they'd be buying this game to satisfy their perversions.
Probably not. I always thought it was blurred to preserve your lunch. Who wants to see a baby's poo-covered nappy? But I wouldn't worry about the censor blur remover. The code itself may be disabled, but that will not really matter.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page