Definitive "bad base" list
brownlustgirl:
About the orchid vase plant, since it is confirmed that it doesn't work with .package files, but Sims3Pack items that show in the catalog next to the orchid vase plant and have the same cost (can't confirm the clone base cause it didn't show when I changed the S3P to .package files and opened with s3pe) did not cause blue/cut out lots in my test hood.
If you care to know what I tested, Shino&KC bathroom parfum and stack of towels.
Grimma:
It seems that items cloned from the "Kinder Kontainer" cheap cribs are faulty as well.
Lion:
And cribs cloned from cribExpensive are fine. What's so different between these two?
brownlustgirl:
Okay, Inge. After reading your thread at MTS, I think I understand the difference between why .package files and Sims3Packs have different outcomes. This is for objects cloned with s3oc, which is used for package files, right? TSRW uses a different procedure for cloning, if I am comprehending correctly?
Are objects being offered as S3P using the s3oc, or do those objects have to be created using TSRW?
Inge:
So many questions, so few answers...
Asking what things are made with won't help an end user. It needs the creators to avoid those bases in the future and maybe remake things that were made using those bases *if* they used s3oc to do the renumbering. Editing in s3pe, anything apart from renumbering in s3oc, and renumbering anything apart from a list of objects (list still being added to) is ok.
Some people have complained about bluelotting with TSRW made objects, but this could be because they have attempted to reuse an object already badly renumbered in s3oc. Or, as I am still ignorant of what the problem is, maybe TSRW is right for some objects and wrong for others and they are not the same ones.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page