Review of the Sims2 Content Manager
J. M. Pescado:
I'm pretty sure you're preaching to the choir here when it comes to the idiocy of censorship. Let's not forget that this site is the result of a fallout over censorship and nannyism issues.
Mmm. And "SimsTransmitSTDs".....now you're making me think about it. :P
Lerf:
Quote from: J. M. Pescado on 2005 July 29, 11:47:08
Mmm. And "SimsTransmitSTDs".....now you're making me think about it. :P
I am a baaaaad influence. :-*
ZephyrZodiac:
I know I get on my soapbox once in a while, but I also feel if these opinions remain unexpressed frequently, those moral self-appointed guardians of our welfare have won by default!
cwieberdink:
Quote from: J. M. Pescado on 2005 July 29, 11:47:08
I'm pretty sure you're preaching to the choir here when it comes to the idiocy of censorship. Let's not forget that this site is the result of a fallout over censorship and nannyism issues.
To bring this back to the topic of content manager, I did scan a handful of those uncategorized letter/number jumble items with datgen. It appears that at least the 10 or so that I opened have texture and/or image files. One was grass, one was rocks, one was the picture of a lipstick, and a few had skin information. So are these useful files after all? Is there any way to rename them and have them still work properly?
And, JMP, Death to the Nannies! Oh, wait, that's not what you meant ;)
Chris
moonluck:
I personaly think its hallarious how they call them "potential hacks" and not hacks because even they knew that it wouldn't work right.
I, too beleave that this was because of the "JT" incadent, if you look at the credits there were about 5 people working on it.
I think that I will keep this and use clean installer, too. This does have its goods, like how it it tells what a hack overides and it tells what somethings, like roofing, is when clean installer dosn't.
:edit: the ones with red lettering are potential hacks
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page