New AwesomeMod Request Thread
Gastfyr:
Would it be at all possible to expand the no fast aging of inactive babies to include no fast aging of any inactives?
I always update my awesome mod before I play, so I know I have the newest version. I have inactive toddlers jumping right to teens (apparently?), and inactive children aging to teens and then aging again to adults all while my playable teen is still a teen. I don't understand why the game is so broken to begin with, but a fix that forces the entire neighbourhood to actually age in sync would be *greatly* appreciated.
J. M. Pescado:
Quote from: ingeli on 2009 September 26, 18:58:12
I am also curious: what does the Racist-trait do? I saw it in the list, when using Twallans comp for editing.
Nothing, at the moment. It is incomplete.
Wolfeyes:
Quote from: caterpillar on 2009 September 28, 22:37:27
Quote from: Wolfeyes on 2009 September 28, 22:27:28
Quote from: witch on 2009 September 28, 09:05:47
Quote from: Wolfeyes on 2009 September 28, 06:45:25
Ah but ellipses are your friend. And it's not useless to see the percentage of simmers who are interested in fixing the behavior mentioned by Wizard. But you wouldn't get that now would you ? Silly witch, useless fixes are for kids. What a 12 thing to do.
Fixed your post.
Quote
Ellipsis (plural ellipses; from the Greek: ἔλλειψις, élleipsis, "omission") is a mark or series of marks that usually indicate an intentional omission of a word or a phrase from the original text.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellipsis
Just so's you know you're doin' it wrong.
And you failed to read further to see that ellipsis also indicate a pause in thought and/or a sentence... silly witchy ! My ellipsis are intentional here, capiche ? ;)
If you are using ellipses to indicate pauses in your thoughts, your sentences indicate that your thoughts suffer frequent pauses. Like your brain just turns off intermittently.
This is just your perception of the definition for ellipses which is fine. Carry on ! :)
myskaal:
Quote from: Gastfyr on 2009 September 29, 00:50:08
Would it be at all possible to expand the no fast aging of inactive babies to include no fast aging of any inactives?
I always update my awesome mod before I play, so I know I have the newest version. I have inactive toddlers jumping right to teens (apparently?), and inactive children aging to teens and then aging again to adults all while my playable teen is still a teen. I don't understand why the game is so broken to begin with, but a fix that forces the entire neighbourhood to actually age in sync would be *greatly* appreciated.
I second this. Here I was thinking my generation kids would be growing up alongside their peers. But nnnooooo. EA says why the heck would anyone want to do that!?
J. M. Pescado:
Quote from: Gastfyr on 2009 September 29, 00:50:08
Would it be at all possible to expand the no fast aging of inactive babies to include no fast aging of any inactives?
I always update my awesome mod before I play, so I know I have the newest version. I have inactive toddlers jumping right to teens (apparently?), and inactive children aging to teens and then aging again to adults all while my playable teen is still a teen. I don't understand why the game is so broken to begin with, but a fix that forces the entire neighbourhood to actually age in sync would be *greatly* appreciated.
I can't verify this bug at all, despite having watched for it. Do you have a series of saves that perhaps shows this actually occurring?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page