How about a no-clog or reduced-clog toilet global?

<< < (8/20) > >>

Kitiara:
I replace anything that has broken every day for at least 4-5 days. If my family grows too much and traffic/space becomes overly problematical, I May expand. Otherwise, they live on the lawn until they can build, then live in that house until they die. I really don't care if they like it. I am female, but hate shopping. I hate redecorating my own house. My pixel people can learn to appreciate what I gave them the first time. If they don't, well I might disable the smoke detector...

Sandilou:
Quote

The 30 ton compactor? That's my vehicle, a T-34/85 Russian medium tank. Capable of crushing and compacting anything up and including a car.
I'm surprised that you didn't buy an American tank.  But then, I'd be surprised if you bought your tank at all. I suspect that some unsuspecting soldier had to report back to camp minus one tank and in need of a good explanation.
 
 

J. M. Pescado:
Quote from: sandilou on 2005 August 10, 03:15:10

I'm surprised that you didn't buy an American tank.  But then, I'd be surprised if you bought your tank at all. I suspect that some unsuspecting soldier had to report back to camp minus one tank and in need of a good explanation.
Shermans are crap. It wasn't until fairly recently that American tankmaking caught up, and in the field of weapons manufacture, Americans still have much to learn about making a reliable weapon.

DuckSpeak:
Ah yes, the good old T-34/85 tank. Argued by some the best all-around medium tank of WWII. You must have had it for a long time.  ;)

American tanks were quite efficient IMO but they had no respect for them at all. Pershing was never developed like the Soviet IS series were, and during the Korean war the South Korean army recieved no tanks initially. Wusses. Not to mention American tanks are still not the best in the world.  :P

J. M. Pescado:
Quote from: DuckSpeak on 2005 August 10, 04:39:30

American tanks were quite efficient IMO but they had no respect for them at all.
I wouldn't say they were EFFICIENT. Cheap, maybe. Buck for buck, they were certainly a match, but there's only one problem: Every time a tank gets destroyed in the process of matching them buck for buck, PEOPLE DIE. This is not something that is good for morale.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page