New peggy hairs. They doesn't replace anything

<< < (11/34) > >>

Delphy:
Motoki: Err, Peggy has absolutely nothing to do with "getting closer to getting more hair out there".  We *have* tools to do that, we *have* proper custom content hair working in game here, with zero help from Peggy.  So I'm a little confused as to what you are saying. :)  The only delay is in getting things *right*, making sure the layering works, texturing, etc.  But that's being worked on right now... so... soon.

wes_h:
Quote from: zolabee on 2009 July 19, 01:08:34

Like that has ever mattered to her?  What can you do about it? Complain to EA?  We could boycott her site. *But, I thought we already did that*  Realistically though what would be a good plan?  It's not right, but...


Little I can do. It's not like I am reaping a profit from selling the plugins to fund a legal department.

But it isn't right. I spent a *lot* of time getting these developed (with some help from my friends), and wrote the spec that is on the wiki for anyone. And I have been very clear about the terms of use. I shouldn't care, but it is irritating that she is leveraging my free tool for her profit.

There is now a blender script for exporting GEOM meshes now, she could use that. Or pay someone to write a tool from the spec; at least TSR has chosen to try that route. Or she could just post the meshes in a separate, freely redistributable package and sell the textures.

Motoki:
Quote from: Delphy on 2009 July 19, 04:16:37

Motoki: Err, Peggy has absolutely nothing to do with "getting closer to getting more hair out there".  We *have* tools to do that, we *have* proper custom content hair working in game here, with zero help from Peggy.  So I'm a little confused as to what you are saying. :)  The only delay is in getting things *right*, making sure the layering works, texturing, etc.  But that's being worked on right now... so... soon.


I am referring to people's saying her hairs are a good sign that we are closer to getting more custom hairs bla bla. And yes I agree with you, I know you guys have the stuff and I know you guys are also taking the time to make sure it works properly, unlike Peggy.

Quote from: wes_h on 2009 July 19, 04:17:33

Little I can do. It's not like I am reaping a profit from selling the plugins to fund a legal department.

But it isn't right. I spent a *lot* of time getting these developed (with some help from my friends), and wrote the spec that is on the wiki for anyone. And I have been very clear about the terms of use. I shouldn't care, but it is irritating that she is leveraging my free tool for her profit.


No, you should care. As the creator of those tools you have the right to set those terms of use and people should be abiding by them or else attempt to find another method if they refuse to.

There might not be a hell of a lot you can do, but I will at least smear her name wherever I can. :P

Strangel:
Gadwin. Gadwin is your friend.

Quote from: Zaphod Beeblebrox on 2009 July 19, 02:20:39

Here's some screenshots with the two pay hairs from CAS with an EAxis sim (an adoptable child one who grew into a teen recently). Please pardon the darkness as these were shot with the in-game camera; I really need to download a screen-grabbing program (because screen-grabbing with shitty Windows is even darker).
{Snipped}

Zaphod Beeblebrox:
I used to have FRAPS on my old computer.  How is Gadwin compared to it?  Better?

Disregard I suck cocks.  I have my answer.  Gadwin, it is.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page