Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
Jelenedra:
Quote from: rohina on 2009 June 17, 13:56:46
Naw, the Bear wasn't quite as pigheadedly stupid.
The faulty logic and inability to listen or comprehend is all too eerily similar though.
Quote from: jolrei on 2009 June 17, 14:00:44
Yes, ExtraSpeshulBear has been disappointingly boring lately, in my view.
I am counting this as a win.
MaximilianPS:
i've made a post on the official forum that probably is full-filled of grammar error.. at the i'm me ;D
actually i can't find a correct place where post this stuff, so maybe this the correct one 'cause the dancing grammar style ::)
about this thread that probably EAxis will censor, so before they censor me, i wish to save my post ::)
Quote
i agree.. with LOLInAHat
the sims (v3) are ugly and unpleasant !
they looks like a bad version of the characters that come with poser(tm)
they aren't photorealistic, but they aren't cartoon style .. they looks just bad!
they aren't emotive* (i hope the translation is correct) like sims v2
To have a really emotional sim, take the player to some comic situation, that sims 3 totally miss it.
A Sit-Com is based on the exasperation of some situations, that take the watcher to have some funny moments, but the sims (v3) didn't slap no one, if they pee on his pants didn't cry, gealosly didn't take to any situation or reaction !!!
If a sim loose the job didn't cry, didn't be hungry, nothing !
They haven't any kind of emotion, this game is completely FLAT !
I think that someone loose the way, this game is totally boring, nothing happen, and the fact that thay so ugly is the top of the bottom.
what the hell did you do to my fav. game !!!?!? .. i think i hate you now !
rohina:
Why are you interrupting our fight with your nonsense?
timelycorruption:
Quote from: MaximilianPS on 2009 June 17, 19:53:04
i've made a post on the official forum that probably is full-filled of grammar error.. at the i'm me ;D
actually i can't find a correct place where post this stuff, so maybe this the correct one 'cause the dancing grammar style ::)
about this thread that probably EAxis will censor, so before they censor me, i wish to save my post ::)
Start > All Programs > Accessories > Notepad.
rufio:
Quote from: Jelenedra on 2009 June 17, 13:27:56
You are so stupid it hurts sometimes. The fact that you remember rohina telling you at some point that she DID live in Australia means that you were present for a conversation in which she used the past fucking tense.
In fact, she used the present tense, which you would have understood if you knew anything about how tenses work in reported speech. Since you are clearly having trouble, let me rephrase:
rohina said (in the past), "I live (in the present time of the past utterance) in Australia." = rohina said (in the past) that she lived (in the same past time) in Australia.
Contrast:
rohina said (in the past), "I lived (in the past time before the past utterance) in Australia." = rohina said (in the past) that she had lived (in the more remote past) in Australia.
Is that clear enough for you?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page