Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
Aner-Dyfan:
I would like to refer everyone of the original post. The following quote in particular:
Quote
Pescado has strongly suggested that grammatical errors and other behaviour demanding the sharp spork be handled by a barrage of PMs, rather than excessive poking in the thread
I would have posted this earlier yet was afk, so I think all of you should be feeling bad about yourselves in the handling of the new can. It was meant to be handled via PM not sporks in thread, shame on you all.
Rhayden:
Quote from: Frankenbeasley on 2009 May 29, 19:37:59
Quote from: Zazazu on 2009 May 29, 19:26:56
Psst. Hook. We know who you are, your lecherness. You don't need to sign your posts. Ta ta now.
I'm reasonably sure that the Hookster is aware that signing his posts is not obligatory. I am, furthermore, pretty much certain that he chooses to sign his posts. I am also confident that Hook is grown up enough for you to be explicit with your comments. If you want to say: "Hook, stop signing your posts!" then simply say it. This coy, sly obfuscation is beneath you and, might I add, disrespectful given the years of e-lechery that have been so selflessly provided by the esteemed former Senator.
[14:23] <Rhayden> Hey Hook.
[14:23] <Hook> Hey Rhayden :)
[14:23] <Rhayden> Do me a favor and stop signing your posts like a fucking 12-year-old girl.
Like this?
Hook:
Quote from: GelatinousSubstance on 2009 May 29, 19:29:28
Is this what you meant?
Exactly. Thanks. Do people actually do that?
Hook (who has been signing his online posts since before most of you were born)
Zazazu:
Rhayden, I thought about that, but that shows actual annoyance. I'm not that annoyed. Hence, I was intentionally coy. Good to know that translated well.
phyllis_p:
Quote from: Aner-Dyfan on 2009 May 29, 19:46:24
I would like to refer everyone of the original post. The following quote in particular:
Quote
Pescado has strongly suggested that grammatical errors and other behaviour demanding the sharp spork be handled by a barrage of PMs, rather than excessive poking in the thread
I would have posted this earlier yet was afk, so I think all of you should be feeling bad about yourselves in the handling of the new can. It was meant to be handled via PM not sporks in thread, shame on you all.
I thought about that, but I thought maybe he was referring only to threads where the subject was not some sort of ass-hattery or related tardism. Still, I've sent two PM sporks, and received utterly no reply. How unsatisfying.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page