Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.

<< < (39/178) > >>

Hook:
Quote from: Assmitten on 2009 May 29, 19:02:16

And here I was assuming that it was a fuck up. Nice try, though, Hook.


It turns out it WAS a fuck up, and a glorious one at that.  Complaining about starting a sentence with a conjunction while starting that very same complaint with a conjunction.  How good does it get? I mean, NO one fucks up THAT badly. :D

Hook

GelatinousSubstance:
Quote from: msalwaysright on 2009 May 29, 18:31:08

I'm finding it incredibly ironic that it either refuses to capitalize the 'I', or leaves it out of the sentence altogether, but is so obviously full of self importance.
Why this aversion to giving the personal pronoun it's proper due, while insisting on special treatment for itself?

What manner of psychosis is this? Someone with learnings of psychology please explain.


I really wish you didn't ask, because now I have to muse over it.

According to handwriting analysis, the ‘I' is in relation to the parental influence. It is the height of the upper letters that foretell of someone's level of self-importance.

For instance, a written capital ‘I' that is closed on the top, suggests a person that is maternally influenced; if closed at the bottom, the influence is fraternal  paternal - closed at both ends or not closed at all should be apparent at this point, and a straight ‘I' in handwriting is a sign of an orphan or someone who feels no connection to their parents.

Perhaps the refusal to capitalize one's ‘I' in type has something to do with defiance against one's parents, and a need to prove and enforce upon one's own individuality, which almost seems to be the case here.

Hook:
Hm, sounds like numerology to me.  I assume you mean "paternal" rather than "fraternal"... that one confused me a bit at first.

Perhaps you can supply pics of said differences.  I can't visualize them from your descriptions.

Hook

phyllis_p:
Quote from: mickeyjr on 2009 May 29, 18:57:24

Quote from: phyllis_p on 2009 May 29, 18:53:46

* phyllis thinks mickeyjr is campaigning for the Ms. Sheeple contest.


No, I would have to do far more to even be in that running.


You do know you've been nominated, yes?

MickeyJR:
Quote from: phyllis_p on 2009 May 29, 19:16:25

Quote from: mickeyjr on 2009 May 29, 18:57:24

Quote from: phyllis_p on 2009 May 29, 18:53:46

* phyllis thinks mickeyjr is campaigning for the Ms. Sheeple contest.


No, I would have to do far more to even be in that running.


You do know you've been nominated, yes?

Yes. However, my noobism hasn't been on the scale of some of the other noobs. I might put my foot in my mouth, as above, but I know when to own up and shut up. My last thread taught me that. Think it is time for me to go back into LURK MOAR mode for a while.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page