Razor1911 release vs. Reloaded release

<< < (3/56) > >>

Krippakrull:
Quote from: malianx on 2009 May 25, 21:55:50

What's your source on that?


Heh, IRC, so don't put too much stock into it. I'll try it later myself though and report back how it went.

TashaYarrr:
Edit: Nevermind, misunderstood the question (and response) about source.

Rockermonkey:
You mean, you downloaded it the internet-faster kind of way? :o. Please tell haha I want this version now, instead of leaked. So how about some spilling of the beans :p i dont like torrents as they take to long and make me feel guilty :)

timelycorruption:
So what's the hypothesis here? Is Razor1911 full of crap, or no?

TashaYarrr:
Well, I also just noticed one of the main package files has a newer date than the reloaded:

FullBuild0.package, dated 4/29 rather than 4/23.

Razer1911 has been around for like a zillion years (they both have), I doubt they would bother putting the effort into a fake-newer release. (But I really don't know much about the warez scene or rivalries.) And if they did, I doubt they'd drill down and change the date on additional random files.

That said, it really doesn't seem much different, and we're talking a week newer. I suspect most of the bugs and annoyances will be present at retail, but I'm mostly interested in seeing if my occasional game freezes might stop with this one. But I have to go eat goopy carbonara in real life before I can test further.

ETA: Haha, on a whim I just checked wikipedia, and there is a razer1911 article. Quote: "According to the computer crime division of the United States Department of Justice, Razor 1911 is the "oldest game software piracy ring on the internet".

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page